Cortex AI vs Uma
Cortex AI vs Uma, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cortex AI is on 52/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Cortex AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Uma
- our overall score: 58/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 36/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 29 against 12
- funding raised: $40.0M against $3.5M
- LinkedIn following: 5,831 against 1,399
At a glance
| Measure | Cortex AI | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Builds real-world robot and egocentric datasets for embodied AI training and evaluation. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Robotics OS, Computer Vision, Foundation Model | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cortex AI | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 12 | 29 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +93.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $3.5M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,399 | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cortex AI | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 44/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 66/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cortex AI | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cortex AI | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Egocentric Data for Robotics World Models, Robot Data for Fine-Tuning, Human-in-the-Loop Rollouts and Evals, Cortex Marketplace | Not published |
Cortex AI vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, Cortex AI or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Uma rates higher (58/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cortex AI and Uma compare on the numbers?
Uma leads on our overall score (58/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 29/100), domain rating (36/100 against 25/100), headcount (29 against 12), funding raised ($40.0M against $3.5M), LinkedIn following (5,831 against 1,399).
Read the full Cortex AI review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other Cortex AI alternatives we track.