Connecteam vs Explority
Connecteam vs Explority, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Connecteam is on 62/100 and Explority on 15/100.
Where each one leads
Connecteam
- our overall score: 62/100 against 15/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 12/100
- headcount: 523 against 1
- headcount growth: +22.7% against -33.2%
- LinkedIn following: 26,391 against 77
Explority
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 35/100
At a glance
| Measure | Connecteam | Explority |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | All-in-one employee management app for deskless and frontline workers. | Creates frictionless virtual and in-person program experiences for businesses and creators. |
| Category | Enterprise, Employee Management, App, Operations | Enterprise, HR, Employee Engagement, Creator Economy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Connecteam | Explority |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 523 | 1 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +22.7% | -33.2% |
| Total funding | $159M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | $800M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 26,391 | 77 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Connecteam | Explority |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 15/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 3/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 12/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Connecteam | Explority |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Segment |
Connecteam vs Explority: common questions
Which is better, Connecteam or Explority?
On our 0-100 score Connecteam rates higher (62/100 against 15/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Connecteam and Explority compare on the numbers?
Connecteam leads on our overall score (62/100 against 15/100), domain rating (77/100 against 12/100), headcount (523 against 1), headcount growth (+22.7% against -33.2%), LinkedIn following (26,391 against 77). Explority leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 35/100).
Read the full Connecteam review and pricing or the Explority review and pricing. You can also browse other Connecteam alternatives we track.