Conduct vs Pylon
Conduct vs Pylon, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Conduct is on 41/100 and Pylon on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Conduct
- funding raised: $78.1M against $31.0M
Pylon
- our overall score: 67/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 155 against 35
- LinkedIn following: 34,788 against 4,946
At a glance
| Measure | Conduct | Pylon |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Conduct lets IT teams understand, modernise, and run their enterprise systems with AI - fast and with confidence. Starting with SAP. Extending to the entire enterprise stack. | Pylon is an AI-powered, modern support system built for B2B companies to resolve customer issues faster across multiple channels. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Workflow Automation, Customer Service Automation | Agentic AI, Support, B2B SaaS, Customer Support Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Conduct | Pylon |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 35 | 155 |
| Open roles | Not published | 21 |
| Total funding | $78.1M | $31.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,946 | 34,788 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Conduct | Pylon |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 14/100 | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 69/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Conduct | Pylon |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Facebook Pixel |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Conduct | Pylon |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Omnichannel Support, AI Agents & Assistants, Knowledge Management, Account Intelligence |
What users say
| Measure | Conduct | Pylon |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 2 threads |
“Hi there - did anyone use Pylon as support platform and could share their experience (good vs. bad), feedback / features they like / wish to be built? What problems they solved for you / specific use cases? We are considering using Pylon fo”r/CustomerSuccess
Conduct vs Pylon: common questions
Which is better, Conduct or Pylon?
On our 0-100 score Pylon rates higher (67/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Conduct and Pylon compare on the numbers?
Conduct leads on funding raised ($78.1M against $31.0M). Pylon leads on our overall score (67/100 against 41/100), domain rating (73/100 against 36/100), headcount (155 against 35), LinkedIn following (34,788 against 4,946).
What do real users say about Conduct and Pylon?
Pylon: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/CustomerSuccess.
Read the full Conduct review and pricing or the Pylon review and pricing. You can also browse other Conduct alternatives we track.