Como vs Strategy
Como vs Strategy, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Como is on 60/100 and Strategy on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Como
- our overall score: 60/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 8/100
Strategy
- agent readiness: 69/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $715M against $256M
At a glance
| Measure | Como | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Como Sense provides a customer engagement and loyalty platform for businesses to personalize offers and drive sales. | Strategy.ai turns board-approved plans, OKRs, and leadership decisions into governed, machine-usable strategy that enterprise AI copilots and agents can query in real time. |
| Category | Customer Engagement, Mobile, Enterprise, Customer Loyalty | Marketing Automation, Customer Engagement, Personalization, Generative AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2005 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Como | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 175 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +7.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $256M | $715M |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.3B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 37,551 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Como | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 10/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 8/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | C (69/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 8/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Como | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Support stack | Drift | Not detected |
Como vs Strategy: common questions
Which is better, Como or Strategy?
On our 0-100 score Como rates higher (60/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Como and Strategy compare on the numbers?
Como leads on our overall score (60/100 against 38/100), domain rating (68/100 against 8/100). Strategy leads on agent readiness (69/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($715M against $256M).
Read the full Como review and pricing or the Strategy review and pricing. You can also browse other Como alternatives we track.