Comind vs Figma
Comind vs Figma, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Comind is on 49/100 and Figma on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Comind
- funding raised: $102M against $3.8M
Figma
- our overall score: 66/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 2,804 against 82
- LinkedIn following: 1,785,521 against 10,350
At a glance
| Measure | Comind | Figma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Our mission is to redefine the way the brain is measured and treated to optimise patient outcomes across the care continuum. | Figma is a collaborative interface design tool that helps design and development teams build great products together through design, prototyping, and developer handoff features. |
| Category | Creative Workflow Automation, Client Communication Platform, Project Management Software, Generative AI | Software Design, Collaboration, Design Collaboration Tool, Interface Design Tool |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Comind | Figma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 82 | 2,804 |
| Total funding | $102M | $3.8M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,350 | 1,785,521 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Comind | Figma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 53/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 57/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Comind | Figma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Framer | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Comind | Figma |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Figma Design, Dev Mode, FigJam, Auto Layout, Design Systems, Figma Make |
Comind vs Figma: common questions
Which is better, Comind or Figma?
On our 0-100 score Figma rates higher (66/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Comind and Figma compare on the numbers?
Comind leads on funding raised ($102M against $3.8M). Figma leads on our overall score (66/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 43/100), domain rating (92/100 against 31/100), headcount (2,804 against 82), LinkedIn following (1,785,521 against 10,350).
Read the full Comind review and pricing or the Figma review and pricing. You can also browse other Comind alternatives we track.