Collective[i] vs SubStrata
Collective[i] vs SubStrata, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Collective[i] is on 49/100 and SubStrata on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Collective[i]
- headcount: 47 against 33
- funding raised: $20.0M against $1.1M
- LinkedIn following: 9,700 against 3,020
SubStrata
- our overall score: 56/100 against 49/100
At a glance
| Measure | Collective[i] | SubStrata |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform that helps B2B sales teams improve forecasting and performance. | Deep learning platform that scales B2B companies with real-time behavioral sales intelligence. |
| Category | Sales Intelligence, Sales Enablement, B2B SaaS, Revenue Operations | Enterprise, Intelligence, Deal, Sales |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Collective[i] | SubStrata |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | 33 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +11.9% |
| Total funding | $20.0M | $1.1M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,700 | 3,020 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Collective[i] | SubStrata |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 43/100 | 46/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Collective[i] | SubStrata |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
Collective[i] vs SubStrata: common questions
Which is better, Collective[i] or SubStrata?
On our 0-100 score SubStrata rates higher (56/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Collective[i] and SubStrata compare on the numbers?
Collective[i] leads on headcount (47 against 33), funding raised ($20.0M against $1.1M), LinkedIn following (9,700 against 3,020). SubStrata leads on our overall score (56/100 against 49/100).
Read the full Collective[i] review and pricing or the SubStrata review and pricing. You can also browse other Collective[i] alternatives we track.

