Cofertility vs Wheel
Cofertility vs Wheel, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cofertility is on 54/100 and Wheel on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Cofertility
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Wheel
- our overall score: 61/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 57/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 291 against 43
- funding raised: $226M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 25,787 against 15,557
At a glance
| Measure | Cofertility | Wheel |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Making egg freezing and donation accessible and human-centered through a tech-enabled fertility ecosystem. | Enables companies to launch and scale virtual care programs with technology, clinicians, and data. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Fertility Tech, Telemedicine | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Clinical Operations, Virtual Care |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Austin, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cofertility | Wheel |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 43 | 291 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +37.5% |
| Total funding | $5.0M | $226M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,557 | 25,787 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cofertility | Wheel |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | 48/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 79/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cofertility | Wheel |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Cofertility vs Wheel: common questions
Which is better, Cofertility or Wheel?
On our 0-100 score Wheel rates higher (61/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cofertility and Wheel compare on the numbers?
Wheel leads on our overall score (61/100 against 54/100), domain rating (57/100 against 51/100), headcount (291 against 43), funding raised ($226M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (25,787 against 15,557).
Read the full Cofertility review and pricing or the Wheel review and pricing. You can also browse other Cofertility alternatives we track.