Tabnine vs Cursor
Tabnine vs Cursor, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Tabnine is on 64/100 and Cursor on 77/100.
Where each one leads
Tabnine
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 64/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 78/100
- headcount: 1,081 against 68
- headcount growth: +500.0% against +13.9%
- funding raised: $2.9B against $55.1M
- LinkedIn following: 361,335 against 23,617
At a glance
| Measure | Tabnine | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Tabnine is a secure generative AI code assistant that enhances developer efficiency with dependable code completion. | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, Coding, Generative AI | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Tabnine | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 68 | 1,081 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.9% | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $55.1M | $2.9B |
| Latest round | Series B | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $50B |
| LinkedIn followers | 23,617 | 361,335 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Tabnine | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 58/100 | 83/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 93/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Tabnine | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Tabnine | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | Not published | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra |
What users say
| Measure | Tabnine | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 4 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“One competitor off my list - tabnine. While I waited for my usage limit to reset, I tried tabnine giving it one simple task: "Refactor my homepage for clean code". It failed miserably.”r/ClaudeAI
Tabnine vs Cursor: common questions
Which is better, Tabnine or Cursor?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Tabnine and Cursor compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 64/100), domain rating (90/100 against 78/100), headcount (1,081 against 68), headcount growth (+500.0% against +13.9%), funding raised ($2.9B against $55.1M), LinkedIn following (361,335 against 23,617).
What do real users say about Tabnine and Cursor?
Tabnine: 0 positive and 4 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ClaudeAI.
Read the full Tabnine review and pricing or the Cursor review and pricing. You can also browse other Tabnine alternatives we track.