Clicks vs Decagon AI
Clicks vs Decagon AI, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Clicks is on 12/100 and Decagon AI on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Clicks
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Decagon AI
- our overall score: 68/100 against 12/100
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 17/100
- headcount: 502 against 3
At a glance
| Measure | Clicks | Decagon AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Computer use agents to automate all back-office work | AI concierge platform for customer interactions. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Agentic AI | Artificial Intelligence, Customer Service, Agentic AI, Support |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2025 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Zürich, Switzerland | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Clicks | Decagon AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3 | 502 |
| Total funding | Not published | $250M |
| Latest round | Not published | late-stage funding |
| Valuation | Not published | $4.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 67,999 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Clicks | Decagon AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 12/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 6/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 17/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Clicks | Decagon AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Clicks vs Decagon AI: common questions
Which is better, Clicks or Decagon AI?
On our 0-100 score Decagon AI rates higher (68/100 against 12/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Clicks and Decagon AI compare on the numbers?
Decagon AI leads on our overall score (68/100 against 12/100), agent readiness (54/100 against 21/100), domain rating (72/100 against 17/100), headcount (502 against 3).
Read the full Clicks review and pricing or the Decagon AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Clicks alternatives we track.