Clean Food Group vs Decameal
Clean Food Group vs Decameal, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Clean Food Group is on 51/100 and Decameal on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Clean Food Group
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 11 against 8
- funding raised: $12.6M against $700K
Decameal
- our overall score: 55/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 35/100 against 1/100
At a glance
| Measure | Clean Food Group | Decameal |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Pioneering sustainable oils and fats through fermentation. | Converts invasive shore crabs into sustainable protein and lipid ingredients for the feed industry. |
| Category | Biotechnology, Food Technology, Sustainable Ingredients, Fermentation | FoodTech, Biotechnology, Sustainable Materials, Animal Feed |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2020 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Grindsted, Denmark |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Clean Food Group | Decameal |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 11 | 8 |
| Total funding | $12.6M | $700K |
| Latest round | Convertible Loan Note | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.2M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 2,413 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Clean Food Group | Decameal |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Clean Food Group | Decameal |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Clean Food Group vs Decameal: common questions
Which is better, Clean Food Group or Decameal?
On our 0-100 score Decameal rates higher (55/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Clean Food Group and Decameal compare on the numbers?
Clean Food Group leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 33/100), headcount (11 against 8), funding raised ($12.6M against $700K). Decameal leads on our overall score (55/100 against 51/100), domain rating (35/100 against 1/100).
Read the full Clean Food Group review and pricing or the Decameal review and pricing. You can also browse other Clean Food Group alternatives we track.