Cleafy vs WMC Global
Cleafy vs WMC Global, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cleafy is on 55/100 and WMC Global on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Cleafy
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
WMC Global
- domain rating: 69/100 against 58/100
- funding raised: $63.0M against $24.8M
At a glance
| Measure | Cleafy | WMC Global |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity platform for banks to detect and prevent attacks before they occur. | Combats phishing and fraud at scale with an agentic AI platform. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Financial Services, Banking, Fintech | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Fraud Detection, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | Milan, Italy | Fremont, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cleafy | WMC Global |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 44 |
| Total funding | $24.8M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 8,553 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cleafy | WMC Global |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cleafy | WMC Global |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Cleafy vs WMC Global: common questions
Which is better, Cleafy or WMC Global?
On our 0-100 score WMC Global rates higher (56/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cleafy and WMC Global compare on the numbers?
WMC Global leads on domain rating (69/100 against 58/100), funding raised ($63.0M against $24.8M).
Read the full Cleafy review and pricing or the WMC Global review and pricing. You can also browse other Cleafy alternatives we track.