Cleafy vs ThreatFabric
Cleafy vs ThreatFabric, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cleafy is on 55/100 and ThreatFabric on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Cleafy
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 38/100
- funding raised: $24.8M against $3.5M
ThreatFabric
- our overall score: 58/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 58/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cleafy | ThreatFabric |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity platform for banks to detect and prevent attacks before they occur. | AI-powered platform for mobile threat intelligence and fraud prevention. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Financial Services, Banking, Fintech | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Fintech, Mobile Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Milan, Italy | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cleafy | ThreatFabric |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 60 |
| Total funding | $24.8M | $3.5M |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 8,613 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cleafy | ThreatFabric |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cleafy | ThreatFabric |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Cleafy vs ThreatFabric: common questions
Which is better, Cleafy or ThreatFabric?
On our 0-100 score ThreatFabric rates higher (58/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cleafy and ThreatFabric compare on the numbers?
Cleafy leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 38/100), funding raised ($24.8M against $3.5M). ThreatFabric leads on our overall score (58/100 against 55/100), domain rating (67/100 against 58/100).
Read the full Cleafy review and pricing or the ThreatFabric review and pricing. You can also browse other Cleafy alternatives we track.