Cleafy vs Kasada
Cleafy vs Kasada, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cleafy is on 55/100 and Kasada on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Cleafy
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Kasada
- our overall score: 58/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 65/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 58/100
- funding raised: $99.9M against $24.8M
At a glance
| Measure | Cleafy | Kasada |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity platform for banks to detect and prevent attacks before they occur. | Kasada protects websites, mobile apps, and APIs from automated attacks with real-time threat detection. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Financial Services, Banking, Fintech | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, API Security, Bot Mitigation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Milan, Italy | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cleafy | Kasada |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 120 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -15.4% |
| Total funding | $24.8M | $99.9M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 6,860 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cleafy | Kasada |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | C (65/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cleafy | Kasada |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Cleafy | Kasada |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 2 threads |
“Bypass Kasada. Hi fellow web scrapers, I wrote a script in Playwright (Python) that automates a login process on https://sportsbet.com.au . This script runs headless and works perfectly fine on my Windows host machine. However, when I run t”r/webscraping
Cleafy vs Kasada: common questions
Which is better, Cleafy or Kasada?
On our 0-100 score Kasada rates higher (58/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cleafy and Kasada compare on the numbers?
Kasada leads on our overall score (58/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (65/100 against 47/100), domain rating (66/100 against 58/100), funding raised ($99.9M against $24.8M).
What do real users say about Cleafy and Kasada?
Kasada: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/webscraping.
Read the full Cleafy review and pricing or the Kasada review and pricing. You can also browse other Cleafy alternatives we track.