Clay vs Sillage
Clay vs Sillage, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Clay is on 43/100 and Sillage on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Clay
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 3/100
- funding raised: $3.0B against $2.0M
Sillage
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Clay | Sillage |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Clay provides an AI-powered platform for go-to-market teams to automate data enrichment, lead generation, and personalized outreach, leveraging over 100 data sources to turn insights into revenue. | AI startup helping enterprise sales teams turn buying signals into qualified pipeline. |
| Category | MarTech, AdTech, Sales Enablement, Data Enrichment | Sales Intelligence, Go-to-Market Automation, Revenue Operations, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Clay | Sillage |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,242 | Not published |
| Total funding | $3.0B | $2.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 158,260 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Clay | Sillage |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 32/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 75/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 3/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Clay | Sillage |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Analytics 4 |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Clay | Sillage |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Multi-provider Data Enrichment, AI Research Agents, Flexible & Iterative Workflows, Real-time Intent Signals, Automated Outbound & Inbound, GTM Stack Consolidation | Not published |
Clay vs Sillage: common questions
Which is better, Clay or Sillage?
On our 0-100 score Sillage rates higher (44/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Clay and Sillage compare on the numbers?
Clay leads on agent readiness (59/100 against 22/100), domain rating (79/100 against 3/100), funding raised ($3.0B against $2.0M).
Read the full Clay review and pricing or the Sillage review and pricing. You can also browse other Clay alternatives we track.