Clay vs Evercontact
Clay vs Evercontact, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Clay is on 43/100 and Evercontact on 15/100.
Where each one leads
Clay
- our overall score: 43/100 against 15/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 45/100
- headcount: 1,242 against 6
- LinkedIn following: 158,260 against 262
Evercontact
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Clay | Evercontact |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Clay provides an AI-powered platform for go-to-market teams to automate data enrichment, lead generation, and personalized outreach, leveraging over 100 data sources to turn insights into revenue. | Company |
| Category | MarTech, AdTech, Sales Enablement, Data Enrichment | Contact Management, Data Enrichment, Sales Enablement, Marketing Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Clay | Evercontact |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,242 | 6 |
| Total funding | $3.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 158,260 | 262 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Clay | Evercontact |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 15/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 8/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 75/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 45/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Clay | Evercontact |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Clay | Evercontact |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Multi-provider Data Enrichment, AI Research Agents, Flexible & Iterative Workflows, Real-time Intent Signals, Automated Outbound & Inbound, GTM Stack Consolidation | Not published |
Clay vs Evercontact: common questions
Which is better, Clay or Evercontact?
On our 0-100 score Clay rates higher (43/100 against 15/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Clay and Evercontact compare on the numbers?
Clay leads on our overall score (43/100 against 15/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 31/100), domain rating (79/100 against 45/100), headcount (1,242 against 6), LinkedIn following (158,260 against 262).
Read the full Clay review and pricing or the Evercontact review and pricing. You can also browse other Clay alternatives we track.