Cisco vs FloLIVE
Cisco vs FloLIVE, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and FloLIVE on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 59/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 179
- funding raised: $220B against $88.2M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 17,368
FloLIVE
- headcount growth: +14.5% against +4.2%
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | FloLIVE |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Global cellular connectivity and private 5G network solutions for IoT. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | IoT, Connected Device, 5G, Network |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 1984 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | FloLIVE |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 179 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | +14.5% |
| Total funding | $220B | $88.2M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 17,368 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | FloLIVE |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 60/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 48/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | FloLIVE |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Cisco vs FloLIVE: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or FloLIVE?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and FloLIVE compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 59/100), domain rating (91/100 against 48/100), headcount (95,924 against 179), funding raised ($220B against $88.2M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 17,368). FloLIVE leads on headcount growth (+14.5% against +4.2%).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the FloLIVE review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.