Circular11 vs GR3N
Circular11 vs GR3N, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Circular11 is on 46/100 and GR3N on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Circular11
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
GR3N
- our overall score: 57/100 against 46/100
- funding raised: $15.5M against $2.9M
At a glance
| Measure | Circular11 | GR3N |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Turning low-grade plastic waste into building materials and home products. | CleanTech company specializing in PET/polyester plastics and fibres recycling using microwave-assisted depolymerisation. |
| Category | Waste Management, Construction, Materials Science, Sustainability | Cleantech, Recycling, Materials Science, Chemicals |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Dorset, United Kingdom | Lugano, Switzerland |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Circular11 | GR3N |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9M | $15.5M |
| Latest round | Equity Funding | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,311 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Circular11 | GR3N |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 42/100 | 13/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 48/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Circular11 | GR3N |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Jetpack Stats | Not detected |
Circular11 vs GR3N: common questions
Which is better, Circular11 or GR3N?
On our 0-100 score GR3N rates higher (57/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Circular11 and GR3N compare on the numbers?
GR3N leads on our overall score (57/100 against 46/100), funding raised ($15.5M against $2.9M).
Read the full Circular11 review and pricing or the GR3N review and pricing. You can also browse other Circular11 alternatives we track.