Check Point Software vs Twingate
Check Point Software vs Twingate, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Check Point Software is on 72/100 and Twingate on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Check Point Software
- our overall score: 72/100 against 61/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 8,461 against 84
- funding raised: $1.5B against $62.0M
- LinkedIn following: 434,966 against 6,806
Twingate
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Check Point Software | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cybersecurity leader providing AI-powered solutions for enterprises and governments. | Twingate provides a Zero Trust Network Access solution that replaces traditional VPNs for secure remote access. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Network Security, Endpoint Security | Cybersecurity, Zero Trust, Network Access, Remote Access |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1993 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Redwood City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Check Point Software | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,461 | 84 |
| Total funding | $1.5B | $62.0M |
| Latest round | Post IPO Debt Funding | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $400M |
| LinkedIn followers | 434,966 | 6,806 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Check Point Software | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 72/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 85/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Check Point Software | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Drift | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Check Point Software vs Twingate: common questions
Which is better, Check Point Software or Twingate?
On our 0-100 score Check Point Software rates higher (72/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Check Point Software and Twingate compare on the numbers?
Check Point Software leads on our overall score (72/100 against 61/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 57/100), domain rating (90/100 against 73/100), headcount (8,461 against 84), funding raised ($1.5B against $62.0M), LinkedIn following (434,966 against 6,806).
Read the full Check Point Software review and pricing or the Twingate review and pricing. You can also browse other Check Point Software alternatives we track.