Check Point Software vs ML Dome
Check Point Software vs ML Dome, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Check Point Software is on 72/100 and ML Dome on 29/100.
Where each one leads
Check Point Software
- our overall score: 72/100 against 29/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 8,461 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 434,966 against 23
ML Dome
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Check Point Software | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cybersecurity leader providing AI-powered solutions for enterprises and governments. | Cloud-based email security protecting Gmail and Office 365 from business email compromise. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Network Security, Endpoint Security | Cybersecurity, Email Security, Threat Detection, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1993 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Check Point Software | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,461 | 2 |
| Total funding | $1.5B | Not published |
| Latest round | Post IPO Debt Funding | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 434,966 | 23 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Check Point Software | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 72/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 85/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Check Point Software | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Fastly |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Drift | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Check Point Software vs ML Dome: common questions
Which is better, Check Point Software or ML Dome?
On our 0-100 score Check Point Software rates higher (72/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Check Point Software and ML Dome compare on the numbers?
Check Point Software leads on our overall score (72/100 against 29/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 21/100), headcount (8,461 against 2), LinkedIn following (434,966 against 23).
Read the full Check Point Software review and pricing or the ML Dome review and pricing. You can also browse other Check Point Software alternatives we track.