Check Point Software vs Guardicore
Check Point Software vs Guardicore, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Check Point Software is on 72/100 and Guardicore on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Check Point Software
- our overall score: 72/100 against 60/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 70/100
- headcount: 8,461 against 60
- funding raised: $1.5B against $112M
- LinkedIn following: 434,966 against 14,681
Guardicore
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Check Point Software | Guardicore |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cybersecurity leader providing AI-powered solutions for enterprises and governments. | Guardicore provides microsegmentation and breach detection software to protect data centers and cloud environments. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Network Security, Endpoint Security | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Network Security, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1993 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Check Point Software | Guardicore |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,461 | 60 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -25.5% |
| Total funding | $1.5B | $112M |
| Latest round | Post IPO Debt Funding | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 434,966 | 14,681 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Check Point Software | Guardicore |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 72/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 85/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Check Point Software | Guardicore |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Drift, Khoros | Not detected |
Check Point Software vs Guardicore: common questions
Which is better, Check Point Software or Guardicore?
On our 0-100 score Check Point Software rates higher (72/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Check Point Software and Guardicore compare on the numbers?
Check Point Software leads on our overall score (72/100 against 60/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 25/100), domain rating (90/100 against 70/100), headcount (8,461 against 60), funding raised ($1.5B against $112M), LinkedIn following (434,966 against 14,681).
Read the full Check Point Software review and pricing or the Guardicore review and pricing. You can also browse other Check Point Software alternatives we track.