Check Point Software Technologies vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings
Check Point Software Technologies vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Check Point Software Technologies is on 70/100 and Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Check Point Software Technologies
- our overall score: 70/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 48/100
- funding raised: $2.0B against $55.0M
Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings
- headcount: 22,232 against 8,382
At a glance
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cybersecurity leader providing AI-powered, cloud-delivered security solutions for enterprises and governments. | Cybersecurity solutions for network, cloud, and hybrid workforces, leveraging threat intelligence and consulting. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Network Security, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Network Security, Cloud Security, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1993 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | תל אביב - יפו, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,382 | 22,232 |
| Total funding | $2.0B | $55.0M |
| Latest round | Convertible Notes | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,908,870 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 85/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Google Cloud |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Drift | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Check Point Software Technologies vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings: common questions
Which is better, Check Point Software Technologies or Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings?
On our 0-100 score Check Point Software Technologies rates higher (70/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Check Point Software Technologies and Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings compare on the numbers?
Check Point Software Technologies leads on our overall score (70/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 48/100), funding raised ($2.0B against $55.0M). Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings leads on headcount (22,232 against 8,382).
Read the full Check Point Software Technologies review and pricing or the Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings review and pricing. You can also browse other Check Point Software Technologies alternatives we track.