Check Point Software Technologies vs jSonar
Check Point Software Technologies vs jSonar, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Check Point Software Technologies is on 70/100 and jSonar on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Check Point Software Technologies
- our overall score: 70/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 8,382 against 968
- funding raised: $2.0B against $83.0M
jSonar
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | jSonar |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cybersecurity leader providing AI-powered, cloud-delivered security solutions for enterprises and governments. | Sonar provides a data security platform that helps organizations discover, classify, and protect sensitive data across various data stores. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Network Security, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Compliance, Database, Enterprise |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1993 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | jSonar |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,382 | 968 |
| Total funding | $2.0B | $83.0M |
| Latest round | Convertible Notes | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 41,025 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | jSonar |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 85/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | jSonar |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Netlify |
| CDN | CloudFront | Netlify |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Drift | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | jSonar |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Imperva to acquire database security startup jSonar.”r/techcrunch
Check Point Software Technologies vs jSonar: common questions
Which is better, Check Point Software Technologies or jSonar?
On our 0-100 score Check Point Software Technologies rates higher (70/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Check Point Software Technologies and jSonar compare on the numbers?
Check Point Software Technologies leads on our overall score (70/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 54/100), headcount (8,382 against 968), funding raised ($2.0B against $83.0M).
What do real users say about Check Point Software Technologies and jSonar?
jSonar: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/techcrunch.
Read the full Check Point Software Technologies review and pricing or the jSonar review and pricing. You can also browse other Check Point Software Technologies alternatives we track.