Check Point Software Technologies vs Ent
Check Point Software Technologies vs Ent, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Check Point Software Technologies is on 70/100 and Ent on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Check Point Software Technologies
- our overall score: 70/100 against 44/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 27/100
- funding raised: $2.0B against $12.0M
Ent
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | Ent |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cybersecurity leader providing AI-powered, cloud-delivered security solutions for enterprises and governments. | Ent is the Intent-Aware Workspace Security Platform that protects work as it happens. It reads human, AI, and application activity in real time and steps in at the moment of risk, not days later. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Network Security, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Endpoint Security, Threat Detection, AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1993 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | Ent |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,382 | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.0B | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Convertible Notes | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 881 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | Ent |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 85/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Check Point Software Technologies | Ent |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Drift | Not detected |
Check Point Software Technologies vs Ent: common questions
Which is better, Check Point Software Technologies or Ent?
On our 0-100 score Check Point Software Technologies rates higher (70/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Check Point Software Technologies and Ent compare on the numbers?
Check Point Software Technologies leads on our overall score (70/100 against 44/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 48/100), domain rating (90/100 against 27/100), funding raised ($2.0B against $12.0M).
Read the full Check Point Software Technologies review and pricing or the Ent review and pricing. You can also browse other Check Point Software Technologies alternatives we track.