Ceribell vs NeuraLight
Ceribell vs NeuraLight, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ceribell is on 58/100 and NeuraLight on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Ceribell
- domain rating: 50/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 397 against 29
- LinkedIn following: 25,218 against 7,466
NeuraLight
- funding raised: $43.0M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Ceribell | NeuraLight |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered EEG device for rapid seizure detection in critical care. | AI-powered digital health company transforming neurology with oculometrics for diagnostics and clinical development. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials | Neurology, Healthcare, Telehealth, Biomarkers |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ceribell | NeuraLight |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 397 | 29 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -11.2% |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $43.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,218 | 7,466 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ceribell | NeuraLight |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ceribell | NeuraLight |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Linkedin Insight |
Ceribell vs NeuraLight: common questions
Which is better, Ceribell or NeuraLight?
On our 0-100 score Ceribell rates higher (58/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ceribell and NeuraLight compare on the numbers?
Ceribell leads on domain rating (50/100 against 29/100), headcount (397 against 29), LinkedIn following (25,218 against 7,466). NeuraLight leads on funding raised ($43.0M against $1.0M).
Read the full Ceribell review and pricing or the NeuraLight review and pricing. You can also browse other Ceribell alternatives we track.