Cerca Magnetics vs Sedivention
Cerca Magnetics vs Sedivention, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cerca Magnetics is on 63/100 and Sedivention on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Cerca Magnetics
- our overall score: 63/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 11/100
Sedivention
- agent readiness: 27/100 against 22/100
- funding raised: $10.0M against $6.8M
At a glance
| Measure | Cerca Magnetics | Sedivention |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing wearable brain imaging systems using quantum sensing technology. | Developing a minimally invasive, one-time outpatient therapy for obesity treatment. |
| Category | Medical Devices, Biotechnology, Healthcare Technology, Quantum Technology | Medical Devices, Biotechnology, HealthTech, Obesity Treatment |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2020 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Nottingham, United Kingdom | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cerca Magnetics | Sedivention |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 20 | Not published |
| Total funding | $6.8M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| Valuation | $37.5M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,967 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cerca Magnetics | Sedivention |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 100/100 | 36/100 |
| Search visibility | 59/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 11/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cerca Magnetics | Sedivention |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cerca Magnetics vs Sedivention: common questions
Which is better, Cerca Magnetics or Sedivention?
On our 0-100 score Cerca Magnetics rates higher (63/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cerca Magnetics and Sedivention compare on the numbers?
Cerca Magnetics leads on our overall score (63/100 against 54/100), domain rating (55/100 against 11/100). Sedivention leads on agent readiness (27/100 against 22/100), funding raised ($10.0M against $6.8M).
Read the full Cerca Magnetics review and pricing or the Sedivention review and pricing. You can also browse other Cerca Magnetics alternatives we track.