Cerca Magnetics vs Establishment Labs Holdings
Cerca Magnetics vs Establishment Labs Holdings, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cerca Magnetics is on 63/100 and Establishment Labs Holdings on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Cerca Magnetics
- our overall score: 63/100 against 48/100
Establishment Labs Holdings
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 954 against 20
- funding raised: $63.0M against $6.8M
- LinkedIn following: 36,364 against 1,967
At a glance
| Measure | Cerca Magnetics | Establishment Labs Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing wearable brain imaging systems using quantum sensing technology. | A global medical technology company focused on women's health and wellness, particularly in breast aesthetics and reconstruction. |
| Category | Medical Devices, Biotechnology, Healthcare Technology, Quantum Technology | Medical Devices, Biotechnology, Healthcare |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2020 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Nottingham, United Kingdom | Wellington, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cerca Magnetics | Establishment Labs Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 20 | 954 |
| Open roles | Not published | 18 |
| Total funding | $6.8M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Debt Financing |
| Valuation | $37.5M | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,967 | 36,364 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cerca Magnetics | Establishment Labs Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 59/100 |
| Team | 100/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 59/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cerca Magnetics | Establishment Labs Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cerca Magnetics vs Establishment Labs Holdings: common questions
Which is better, Cerca Magnetics or Establishment Labs Holdings?
On our 0-100 score Cerca Magnetics rates higher (63/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cerca Magnetics and Establishment Labs Holdings compare on the numbers?
Cerca Magnetics leads on our overall score (63/100 against 48/100). Establishment Labs Holdings leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 22/100), headcount (954 against 20), funding raised ($63.0M against $6.8M), LinkedIn following (36,364 against 1,967).
Read the full Cerca Magnetics review and pricing or the Establishment Labs Holdings review and pricing. You can also browse other Cerca Magnetics alternatives we track.