Centrical vs Connecteam
Centrical vs Connecteam, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Centrical is on 51/100 and Connecteam on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Centrical
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 35/100
Connecteam
- our overall score: 62/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 523 against 105
- headcount growth: +22.7% against -8.5%
- funding raised: $159M against $66.0M
- LinkedIn following: 26,391 against 12,880
At a glance
| Measure | Centrical | Connecteam |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Centrical is an AI-powered employee Performance eXperience platform driving frontline agent success and best-in-class customer experiences. | All-in-one employee management app for deskless and frontline workers. |
| Category | Enterprise, Employee Management, Employee Performance Management, Employee Experience | Enterprise, Employee Management, App, Operations |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Centrical | Connecteam |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 105 | 523 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -8.5% | +22.7% |
| Total funding | $66.0M | $159M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $800M |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,880 | 26,391 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Centrical | Connecteam |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Centrical | Connecteam |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Centrical vs Connecteam: common questions
Which is better, Centrical or Connecteam?
On our 0-100 score Connecteam rates higher (62/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Centrical and Connecteam compare on the numbers?
Centrical leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 35/100). Connecteam leads on our overall score (62/100 against 51/100), domain rating (77/100 against 60/100), headcount (523 against 105), headcount growth (+22.7% against -8.5%), funding raised ($159M against $66.0M), LinkedIn following (26,391 against 12,880).
Read the full Centrical review and pricing or the Connecteam review and pricing. You can also browse other Centrical alternatives we track.