Celleste Bio vs Mush Foods
Celleste Bio vs Mush Foods, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Celleste Bio is on 53/100 and Mush Foods on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Celleste Bio
- headcount: 22 against 11
- headcount growth: +121.8% against -5.6%
Mush Foods
- funding raised: $12.0M against $4.5M
- LinkedIn following: 4,590 against 2,569
At a glance
| Measure | Celleste Bio | Mush Foods |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Celleste Bio produces high-value cocoa ingredients using cell culture, bypassing traditional agriculture. | Israeli food tech company growing mushroom mycelium for sustainable animal-free protein ingredients. |
| Category | Food, Agritech, Life Sciences, FoodTech | Food, Protein, FoodTech, Alternative Protein |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Ingredient |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Celleste Bio | Mush Foods |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22 | 11 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +121.8% | -5.6% |
| Total funding | $4.5M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,569 | 4,590 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Celleste Bio | Mush Foods |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 8/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Celleste Bio | Mush Foods |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Shopify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
Celleste Bio vs Mush Foods: common questions
Which is better, Celleste Bio or Mush Foods?
On our 0-100 score Celleste Bio rates higher (53/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Celleste Bio and Mush Foods compare on the numbers?
Celleste Bio leads on headcount (22 against 11), headcount growth (+121.8% against -5.6%). Mush Foods leads on funding raised ($12.0M against $4.5M), LinkedIn following (4,590 against 2,569).
Read the full Celleste Bio review and pricing or the Mush Foods review and pricing. You can also browse other Celleste Bio alternatives we track.