Cellebrite vs ZecOps
Cellebrite vs ZecOps, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cellebrite is on 62/100 and ZecOps on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Cellebrite
- our overall score: 62/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 1,037 against 12
- funding raised: $110M against $13.7M
ZecOps
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 72/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cellebrite | ZecOps |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digital intelligence leader for investigations, accelerating justice and ensuring data security for public and private organizations. | Automated crash forensics platform for detecting advanced threats and vulnerabilities. |
| Category | Mobile, Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Digital Intelligence Solutions | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Detection, DevSecOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1999 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Petah Tikva, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cellebrite | ZecOps |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,037 | 12 |
| Total funding | $110M | $13.7M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| Valuation | $440M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 58,672 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cellebrite | ZecOps |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 7/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cellebrite | ZecOps |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Cellebrite vs ZecOps: common questions
Which is better, Cellebrite or ZecOps?
On our 0-100 score Cellebrite rates higher (62/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cellebrite and ZecOps compare on the numbers?
Cellebrite leads on our overall score (62/100 against 53/100), headcount (1,037 against 12), funding raised ($110M against $13.7M). ZecOps leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 25/100), domain rating (82/100 against 72/100).
Read the full Cellebrite review and pricing or the ZecOps review and pricing. You can also browse other Cellebrite alternatives we track.