Cellebrite vs Wandera
Cellebrite vs Wandera, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cellebrite is on 62/100 and Wandera on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Cellebrite
- our overall score: 62/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 1,037 against 240
- funding raised: $110M against $53.5M
Wandera
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 72/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cellebrite | Wandera |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digital intelligence leader for investigations, accelerating justice and ensuring data security for public and private organizations. | Jamf provides comprehensive Apple device management and security solutions for businesses, education, and government organizations. |
| Category | Mobile, Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Digital Intelligence Solutions | Mobile, Cybersecurity, Mobile Security, Phishing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1999 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Petah Tikva, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cellebrite | Wandera |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,037 | 240 |
| Total funding | $110M | $53.5M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| Valuation | $440M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 58,672 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cellebrite | Wandera |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cellebrite | Wandera |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Cellebrite | Wandera |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“What they can VIEW: Every website I visit via Wandera DNS — not just at school, but at home and on mobile data 24/7 Every app on my device My network information and real MAC address (they disabled MAC randomization so I'm trackable everywh”r/Spyware
Cellebrite vs Wandera: common questions
Which is better, Cellebrite or Wandera?
On our 0-100 score Cellebrite rates higher (62/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cellebrite and Wandera compare on the numbers?
Cellebrite leads on our overall score (62/100 against 55/100), headcount (1,037 against 240), funding raised ($110M against $53.5M). Wandera leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 25/100), domain rating (82/100 against 72/100).
What do real users say about Cellebrite and Wandera?
Wandera: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Spyware.
Read the full Cellebrite review and pricing or the Wandera review and pricing. You can also browse other Cellebrite alternatives we track.