Cellebrite vs Neura
Cellebrite vs Neura, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cellebrite is on 62/100 and Neura on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Cellebrite
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 1,037 against 9
- LinkedIn following: 58,672 against 5,048
Neura
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 72/100
- funding raised: $1.0B against $110M
At a glance
| Measure | Cellebrite | Neura |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digital intelligence leader for investigations, accelerating justice and ensuring data security for public and private organizations. | Neura helps mobile brands enhance customer engagement and retention using AI-powered real-world insights and advanced campaign segmentation. |
| Category | Mobile, Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Digital Intelligence Solutions | Mobile, IoT, Consumer, Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B, B2B2C, B2G |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1999 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Petah Tikva, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cellebrite | Neura |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,037 | 9 |
| Total funding | $110M | $1.0B |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | $440M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 58,672 | 5,048 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cellebrite | Neura |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cellebrite | Neura |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Angular |
Cellebrite vs Neura: common questions
Which is better, Cellebrite or Neura?
On our 0-100 score Cellebrite rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cellebrite and Neura compare on the numbers?
Cellebrite leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), headcount (1,037 against 9), LinkedIn following (58,672 against 5,048). Neura leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 25/100), domain rating (92/100 against 72/100), funding raised ($1.0B against $110M).
Read the full Cellebrite review and pricing or the Neura review and pricing. You can also browse other Cellebrite alternatives we track.