CellaVision vs Viz.ai
CellaVision vs Viz.ai, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CellaVision is on 30/100 and Viz.ai on 74/100.
Where each one leads
CellaVision
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Viz.ai
- our overall score: 74/100 against 30/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 49/100
- headcount: 331 against 250
- LinkedIn following: 48,917 against 19,143
At a glance
| Measure | CellaVision | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven digital hematology microscopy for clinical labs. | AI-powered care coordination platform for faster diagnosis and treatment of critical conditions. |
| Category | Medical Imaging, Healthcare AI, Hematology, Deep Learning | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Strokes, Healthcare AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | Software |
| Founded | 1994 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Lund, Sweden | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CellaVision | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 250 | 331 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -4.9% |
| Total funding | Not published | $292M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,143 | 48,917 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CellaVision | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 30/100 | 74/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CellaVision | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom |
What users say
| Measure | CellaVision | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
CellaVision vs Viz.ai: common questions
Which is better, CellaVision or Viz.ai?
On our 0-100 score Viz.ai rates higher (74/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CellaVision and Viz.ai compare on the numbers?
Viz.ai leads on our overall score (74/100 against 30/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 35/100), domain rating (68/100 against 49/100), headcount (331 against 250), LinkedIn following (48,917 against 19,143).
Read the full CellaVision review and pricing or the Viz.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other CellaVision alternatives we track.