CATO Networks vs Zscaler
CATO Networks vs Zscaler, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CATO Networks is on 74/100 and Zscaler on 70/100.
Where each one leads
CATO Networks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 70/100
- funding raised: $951M against $148M
Zscaler
- headcount: 6,000 against 1,692
At a glance
| Measure | CATO Networks | Zscaler |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone. | Securing the enterprise AI journey. |
| Category | SASE, SD-WAN, Network Security, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Jose, USA |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CATO Networks | Zscaler |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,692 | 6,000 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +36.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $951M | $148M |
| Latest round | Series H | Post-IPO Equity |
| Valuation | $3.0B | $11B |
| LinkedIn followers | 191,952 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Zscaler |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 40/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Zscaler |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
CATO Networks vs Zscaler: common questions
Which is better, CATO Networks or Zscaler?
On our 0-100 score CATO Networks rates higher (74/100 against 70/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CATO Networks and Zscaler compare on the numbers?
CATO Networks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 70/100), funding raised ($951M against $148M). Zscaler leads on headcount (6,000 against 1,692).
Read the full CATO Networks review and pricing or the Zscaler review and pricing. You can also browse other CATO Networks alternatives we track.