CATO Networks vs Zero Networks
CATO Networks vs Zero Networks, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CATO Networks is on 74/100 and Zero Networks on 60/100.
Where each one leads
CATO Networks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 60/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 1,692 against 182
- funding raised: $951M against $100M
- LinkedIn following: 191,952 against 12,695
Zero Networks
- headcount growth: +58.1% against +36.5%
At a glance
| Measure | CATO Networks | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone. | Automated zero trust network segmentation and remote access platform. |
| Category | SASE, SD-WAN, Network Security, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Network, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CATO Networks | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,692 | 182 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +36.5% | +58.1% |
| Total funding | $951M | $100M |
| Latest round | Series H | Not published |
| Valuation | $3.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 191,952 | 12,695 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Alpinejs, Bootstrap |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
CATO Networks vs Zero Networks: common questions
Which is better, CATO Networks or Zero Networks?
On our 0-100 score CATO Networks rates higher (74/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CATO Networks and Zero Networks compare on the numbers?
CATO Networks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 60/100), domain rating (76/100 against 59/100), headcount (1,692 against 182), funding raised ($951M against $100M), LinkedIn following (191,952 against 12,695). Zero Networks leads on headcount growth (+58.1% against +36.5%).
Read the full CATO Networks review and pricing or the Zero Networks review and pricing. You can also browse other CATO Networks alternatives we track.