CATO Networks vs Twingate

CATO Networks vs Twingate, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CATO Networks is on 74/100 and Twingate on 61/100.

CATO Networks logo
CATO NetworksThe world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone.
Try CATO Networks
Twingate logo
TwingateTwingate provides a Zero Trust Network Access solution that replaces traditional VPNs for secure remote access.
Try Twingate

Where each one leads

CATO Networks

  • our overall score: 74/100 against 61/100
  • headcount: 1,692 against 84
  • funding raised: $951M against $62.0M
  • LinkedIn following: 191,952 against 6,806

Twingate

  • agent readiness: 57/100 against 50/100

At a glance

MeasureCATO NetworksTwingate
What it isThe world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone.Twingate provides a Zero Trust Network Access solution that replaces traditional VPNs for secure remote access.
CategorySASE, SD-WAN, Network Security, Cloud SecurityCybersecurity, Zero Trust, Network Access, Remote Access
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B
OfferingPlatformSoftware
Founded20152019
HeadquartersTel Aviv, IsraelRedwood City, United States
StatusInactiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureCATO NetworksTwingate
Employees1,69284
Headcount growthLast 12 months+36.5%Not published
Total funding$951M$62.0M
Latest roundSeries HSeries B
Valuation$3.0B$400M
LinkedIn followers191,9526,806

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureCATO NetworksTwingate
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating74/10061/100
Traction60/10058/100
Team70/10070/100
Community8/100Not published
Search visibility47/10034/100
Quality86/10068/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (50/100)D (57/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10076/10073/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureCATO NetworksTwingate
CMSNot detectedFramer
Open sourceNoYes

CATO Networks vs Twingate: common questions

Which is better, CATO Networks or Twingate?

On our 0-100 score CATO Networks rates higher (74/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do CATO Networks and Twingate compare on the numbers?

CATO Networks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 61/100), headcount (1,692 against 84), funding raised ($951M against $62.0M), LinkedIn following (191,952 against 6,806). Twingate leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 50/100).

Read the full CATO Networks review and pricing or the Twingate review and pricing. You can also browse other CATO Networks alternatives we track.