CATO Networks vs Thundergate
CATO Networks vs Thundergate, compared side by side on 8 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CATO Networks is on 74/100 and Thundergate on 7/100.
Where each one leads
CATO Networks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 7/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 1/100
Thundergate
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CATO Networks | Thundergate |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone. | ThunderGate drives Broadcom Tigon3 (NetXtreme / NetLink, including the 57762 in Apple) |
| Category | SASE, SD-WAN, Network Security, Cloud Security | Networking Hardware, Driver Development, Broadcom, Enterprise Networking |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CATO Networks | Thundergate |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,692 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +36.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $951M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series H | Not published |
| Valuation | $3.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 191,952 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Thundergate |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 1/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Thundergate |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Fastly |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
CATO Networks vs Thundergate: common questions
Which is better, CATO Networks or Thundergate?
On our 0-100 score CATO Networks rates higher (74/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 8 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CATO Networks and Thundergate compare on the numbers?
CATO Networks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 7/100), domain rating (76/100 against 1/100).
Read the full CATO Networks review and pricing or the Thundergate review and pricing. You can also browse other CATO Networks alternatives we track.