CATO Networks vs Perimeter 81
CATO Networks vs Perimeter 81, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CATO Networks is on 74/100 and Perimeter 81 on 69/100.
Where each one leads
CATO Networks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 69/100
- headcount: 1,692 against 97
- headcount growth: +36.5% against -26.3%
- funding raised: $951M against $155M
- LinkedIn following: 191,952 against 33,562
Perimeter 81
- domain rating: 90/100 against 76/100
At a glance
| Measure | CATO Networks | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone. | Converged networking and cybersecurity platform for secure remote and office access to all resources. |
| Category | SASE, SD-WAN, Network Security, Cloud Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Network, Network Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CATO Networks | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,692 | 97 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +36.5% | -26.3% |
| Total funding | $951M | $155M |
| Latest round | Series H | Series C |
| Valuation | $3.0B | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 191,952 | 33,562 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom |
CATO Networks vs Perimeter 81: common questions
Which is better, CATO Networks or Perimeter 81?
On our 0-100 score CATO Networks rates higher (74/100 against 69/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CATO Networks and Perimeter 81 compare on the numbers?
CATO Networks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 69/100), headcount (1,692 against 97), headcount growth (+36.5% against -26.3%), funding raised ($951M against $155M), LinkedIn following (191,952 against 33,562). Perimeter 81 leads on domain rating (90/100 against 76/100).
Read the full CATO Networks review and pricing or the Perimeter 81 review and pricing. You can also browse other CATO Networks alternatives we track.