CATO Networks vs Megaport
CATO Networks vs Megaport, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CATO Networks is on 74/100 and Megaport on 54/100.
Where each one leads
CATO Networks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 1,692 against 599
- funding raised: $951M against $629M
- LinkedIn following: 191,952 against 44,965
Megaport
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CATO Networks | Megaport |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone. | Global cloud connectivity and networking services provider. |
| Category | SASE, SD-WAN, Network Security, Cloud Security | Cloud Computing, Networking, Data Center, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Brisbane, Australia |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CATO Networks | Megaport |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,692 | 599 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +36.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $951M | $629M |
| Latest round | Series H | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $3.0B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 191,952 | 44,965 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Megaport |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Megaport |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
CATO Networks vs Megaport: common questions
Which is better, CATO Networks or Megaport?
On our 0-100 score CATO Networks rates higher (74/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CATO Networks and Megaport compare on the numbers?
CATO Networks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 41/100), headcount (1,692 against 599), funding raised ($951M against $629M), LinkedIn following (191,952 against 44,965).
Read the full CATO Networks review and pricing or the Megaport review and pricing. You can also browse other CATO Networks alternatives we track.