CATO Networks vs Maya Mesh
CATO Networks vs Maya Mesh, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CATO Networks is on 74/100 and Maya Mesh on 11/100.
Where each one leads
CATO Networks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 11/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 9/100
- LinkedIn following: 191,952 against 841
Maya Mesh
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 50/100
At a glance
| Measure | CATO Networks | Maya Mesh |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone. | Architecture, integration patterns, and developer resources for the Maya agentic firewall fabric. |
| Category | SASE, SD-WAN, Network Security, Cloud Security | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Cybersecurity, Network Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CATO Networks | Maya Mesh |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,692 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +36.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $951M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series H | Not published |
| Valuation | $3.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 191,952 | 841 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Maya Mesh |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 11/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 9/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Maya Mesh |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
CATO Networks vs Maya Mesh: common questions
Which is better, CATO Networks or Maya Mesh?
On our 0-100 score CATO Networks rates higher (74/100 against 11/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CATO Networks and Maya Mesh compare on the numbers?
CATO Networks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 11/100), domain rating (76/100 against 9/100), LinkedIn following (191,952 against 841). Maya Mesh leads on agent readiness (59/100 against 50/100).
Read the full CATO Networks review and pricing or the Maya Mesh review and pricing. You can also browse other CATO Networks alternatives we track.