CATO Networks vs Luminate Security
CATO Networks vs Luminate Security, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CATO Networks is on 74/100 and Luminate Security on 55/100.
Where each one leads
CATO Networks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 1,692 against 11
- headcount growth: +36.5% against -10.3%
- funding raised: $951M against $14.0M
- LinkedIn following: 191,952 against 977
Luminate Security
- domain rating: 90/100 against 76/100
At a glance
| Measure | CATO Networks | Luminate Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone. | Global technology leader that designs, develops and supplies a broad range of semiconductor and infrastructure software solutions. |
| Category | SASE, SD-WAN, Network Security, Cloud Security | Software Defined (SD), Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CATO Networks | Luminate Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,692 | 11 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +36.5% | -10.3% |
| Total funding | $951M | $14.0M |
| Latest round | Series H | Series A |
| Valuation | $3.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 191,952 | 977 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Luminate Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Luminate Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
CATO Networks vs Luminate Security: common questions
Which is better, CATO Networks or Luminate Security?
On our 0-100 score CATO Networks rates higher (74/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CATO Networks and Luminate Security compare on the numbers?
CATO Networks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 37/100), headcount (1,692 against 11), headcount growth (+36.5% against -10.3%), funding raised ($951M against $14.0M), LinkedIn following (191,952 against 977). Luminate Security leads on domain rating (90/100 against 76/100).
Read the full CATO Networks review and pricing or the Luminate Security review and pricing. You can also browse other CATO Networks alternatives we track.

