CATO Networks vs Cradlepoint
CATO Networks vs Cradlepoint, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CATO Networks is on 74/100 and Cradlepoint on 9/100.
Where each one leads
CATO Networks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 9/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 45/100
Cradlepoint
- domain rating: 86/100 against 76/100
At a glance
| Measure | CATO Networks | Cradlepoint |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone. | Cradlepoint provides cloud-delivered LTE and 5G wireless network solutions for businesses, enabling secure and reliable connectivity anywhere. |
| Category | SASE, SD-WAN, Network Security, Cloud Security | Wireless Networking, 5G, LTE, Cloud Networking |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Boise, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CATO Networks | Cradlepoint |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,692 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +36.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $951M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series H | Not published |
| Valuation | $3.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 191,952 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Cradlepoint |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 9/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 11/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Cradlepoint |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
CATO Networks vs Cradlepoint: common questions
Which is better, CATO Networks or Cradlepoint?
On our 0-100 score CATO Networks rates higher (74/100 against 9/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CATO Networks and Cradlepoint compare on the numbers?
CATO Networks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 9/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 45/100). Cradlepoint leads on domain rating (86/100 against 76/100).
Read the full CATO Networks review and pricing or the Cradlepoint review and pricing. You can also browse other CATO Networks alternatives we track.

