Cashflows vs Mercury
Cashflows vs Mercury, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cashflows is on 27/100 and Mercury on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Cashflows
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Mercury
- our overall score: 67/100 against 27/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 1,722 against 172
At a glance
| Measure | Cashflows | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A London-based FinTech payments company making it easy for growing businesses and financial institutions to accept card and digital payments. | Business banking. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Merchant Services | Fintech, Neobank, Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2010 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cashflows | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 172 | 1,722 |
| Total funding | Not published | $500M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $5.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,208 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cashflows | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 27/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cashflows | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cashflows vs Mercury: common questions
Which is better, Cashflows or Mercury?
On our 0-100 score Mercury rates higher (67/100 against 27/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cashflows and Mercury compare on the numbers?
Mercury leads on our overall score (67/100 against 27/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 43/100), headcount (1,722 against 172).
Read the full Cashflows review and pricing or the Mercury review and pricing. You can also browse other Cashflows alternatives we track.