CapitalOS vs Reap
CapitalOS vs Reap, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CapitalOS is on 54/100 and Reap on 57/100.
Where each one leads
CapitalOS
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Reap
- our overall score: 57/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 264 against 17
- funding raised: $45.0M against $9.0M
- LinkedIn following: 36,811 against 1,490
At a glance
| Measure | CapitalOS | Reap |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Embedded spend management infrastructure for B2B platforms to launch in days. | A corporate payment solutions platform for businesses to manage and optimize their spending. |
| Category | Fintech, Embedded Finance, Payments, B2B SaaS | Fintech, Payments, Corporate Cards, Expense Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Hong Kong, Hong Kong |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CapitalOS | Reap |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 264 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +11.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $9.0M | $45.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,490 | 36,811 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CapitalOS | Reap |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CapitalOS | Reap |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
CapitalOS vs Reap: common questions
Which is better, CapitalOS or Reap?
On our 0-100 score Reap rates higher (57/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CapitalOS and Reap compare on the numbers?
Reap leads on our overall score (57/100 against 54/100), domain rating (55/100 against 38/100), headcount (264 against 17), funding raised ($45.0M against $9.0M), LinkedIn following (36,811 against 1,490).
Read the full CapitalOS review and pricing or the Reap review and pricing. You can also browse other CapitalOS alternatives we track.