Capital on Tap vs Floodlight
Capital on Tap vs Floodlight, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Capital on Tap is on 55/100 and Floodlight on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Capital on Tap
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 65/100 against 15/100
- headcount: 1,005 against 7
- funding raised: $1.6B against $6.4M
- LinkedIn following: 22,549 against 1,099
Floodlight
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Capital on Tap | Floodlight |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides flexible business credit and payment solutions for SMEs. | Reinventing the finance experience for modern businesses, empowering founders to focus on growth. |
| Category | Fintech, Lending, Payments, Corporate Cards | Fintech, E-commerce, Finance, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Capital on Tap | Floodlight |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,005 | 7 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -23.3% |
| Total funding | $1.6B | $6.4M |
| Latest round | Debt Financing | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,549 | 1,099 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Capital on Tap | Floodlight |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 43/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 15/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Capital on Tap | Floodlight |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
Capital on Tap vs Floodlight: common questions
Which is better, Capital on Tap or Floodlight?
On our 0-100 score Capital on Tap rates higher (55/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Capital on Tap and Floodlight compare on the numbers?
Capital on Tap leads on agent readiness (44/100 against 21/100), domain rating (65/100 against 15/100), headcount (1,005 against 7), funding raised ($1.6B against $6.4M), LinkedIn following (22,549 against 1,099).
Read the full Capital on Tap review and pricing or the Floodlight review and pricing. You can also browse other Capital on Tap alternatives we track.