Candivore vs Tripledot Studios
Candivore vs Tripledot Studios, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Candivore is on 62/100 and Tripledot Studios on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Candivore
- headcount growth: +30.1% against +14.1%
Tripledot Studios
- our overall score: 70/100 against 62/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 570 against 127
- funding raised: $202M against $122M
- LinkedIn following: 44,923 against 18,953
At a glance
| Measure | Candivore | Tripledot Studios |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developer of Match Masters, a popular mobile puzzle game known for its innovative gameplay. | Fastest-growing European mobile game developer entertaining hundreds of millions globally. |
| Category | Gaming, Mobile Games, Puzzle Games, Consumer App | Gaming, Mobile Games, Casual Games, Hypercasual Games |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Candivore | Tripledot Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 127 | 570 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +30.1% | +14.1% |
| Total funding | $122M | $202M |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 18,953 | 44,923 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Candivore | Tripledot Studios |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 79/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 39/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Candivore | Tripledot Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Wix |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Candivore vs Tripledot Studios: common questions
Which is better, Candivore or Tripledot Studios?
On our 0-100 score Tripledot Studios rates higher (70/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Candivore and Tripledot Studios compare on the numbers?
Candivore leads on headcount growth (+30.1% against +14.1%). Tripledot Studios leads on our overall score (70/100 against 62/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 40/100), headcount (570 against 127), funding raised ($202M against $122M), LinkedIn following (44,923 against 18,953).
Read the full Candivore review and pricing or the Tripledot Studios review and pricing. You can also browse other Candivore alternatives we track.