Calyxo vs Cerca Magnetics
Calyxo vs Cerca Magnetics, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Calyxo is on 55/100 and Cerca Magnetics on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Calyxo
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 22/100
- funding raised: $151M against $6.8M
Cerca Magnetics
- our overall score: 63/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 26/100
At a glance
| Measure | Calyxo | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Redefining kidney stone treatment with an aspiration-based stone removal system. | Developing wearable brain imaging systems using quantum sensing technology. |
| Category | Medical Devices, HealthTech, Biotechnology, MedTech | Medical Devices, Biotechnology, Healthcare Technology, Quantum Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Pleasanton, USA | Nottingham, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Calyxo | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 20 |
| Open roles | 21 | Not published |
| Total funding | $151M | $6.8M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $37.5M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,967 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Calyxo | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | Not published |
| Team | Not published | 100/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 59/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Calyxo | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Calyxo vs Cerca Magnetics: common questions
Which is better, Calyxo or Cerca Magnetics?
On our 0-100 score Cerca Magnetics rates higher (63/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Calyxo and Cerca Magnetics compare on the numbers?
Calyxo leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 22/100), funding raised ($151M against $6.8M). Cerca Magnetics leads on our overall score (63/100 against 55/100), domain rating (55/100 against 26/100).
Read the full Calyxo review and pricing or the Cerca Magnetics review and pricing. You can also browse other Calyxo alternatives we track.