Cagent Vascular vs Cerca Magnetics
Cagent Vascular vs Cerca Magnetics, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cagent Vascular is on 42/100 and Cerca Magnetics on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Cagent Vascular
- funding raised: $41.0M against $6.8M
Cerca Magnetics
- our overall score: 63/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 25/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cagent Vascular | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing innovative intravascular lithotripsy technology for treating calcified peripheral artery disease. | Developing wearable brain imaging systems using quantum sensing technology. |
| Category | Medical Devices, Healthcare, Biotechnology | Medical Devices, Biotechnology, Healthcare Technology, Quantum Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Wayne, USA | Nottingham, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cagent Vascular | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 20 |
| Total funding | $41.0M | $6.8M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $37.5M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,967 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cagent Vascular | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 42/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | Not published |
| Team | Not published | 100/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 59/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cagent Vascular | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Squarespace | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Cagent Vascular vs Cerca Magnetics: common questions
Which is better, Cagent Vascular or Cerca Magnetics?
On our 0-100 score Cerca Magnetics rates higher (63/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cagent Vascular and Cerca Magnetics compare on the numbers?
Cagent Vascular leads on funding raised ($41.0M against $6.8M). Cerca Magnetics leads on our overall score (63/100 against 42/100), domain rating (55/100 against 25/100).
Read the full Cagent Vascular review and pricing or the Cerca Magnetics review and pricing. You can also browse other Cagent Vascular alternatives we track.