BrainQ vs Effectivate
BrainQ vs Effectivate, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BrainQ is on 56/100 and Effectivate on 50/100.
Where each one leads
BrainQ
- our overall score: 56/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 36/100 against 18/100
- funding raised: $45.3M against $1.1M
- LinkedIn following: 8,150 against 1,131
Effectivate
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | BrainQ | Effectivate |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Bioelectric medicine company advancing neurorecovery for stroke and neurological conditions. | AI-powered brain training platform for adults 50+ to enhance memory and cognitive function. |
| Category | Healthcare, Neurology, Mental Health, Strokes | Healthcare, Neurology, Analytics, Big Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C, B2B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BrainQ | Effectivate |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 29 | 35 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +34.3% |
| Total funding | $45.3M | $1.1M |
| Latest round | Series B | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,150 | 1,131 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BrainQ | Effectivate |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 52/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 18/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BrainQ | Effectivate |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | BrainQ | Effectivate |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“Daily Crunch: Israel-based stroke therapy tech startup BrainQ raises $40M.”r/techcrunch
BrainQ vs Effectivate: common questions
Which is better, BrainQ or Effectivate?
On our 0-100 score BrainQ rates higher (56/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BrainQ and Effectivate compare on the numbers?
BrainQ leads on our overall score (56/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (40/100 against 25/100), domain rating (36/100 against 18/100), funding raised ($45.3M against $1.1M), LinkedIn following (8,150 against 1,131).
What do real users say about BrainQ and Effectivate?
BrainQ: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/techcrunch.
Read the full BrainQ review and pricing or the Effectivate review and pricing. You can also browse other BrainQ alternatives we track.