BioEye vs NeuraLight
BioEye vs NeuraLight, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BioEye is on 48/100 and NeuraLight on 56/100.
Where each one leads
BioEye
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
NeuraLight
- our overall score: 56/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 29 against 3
- headcount growth: -11.2% against -17.1%
- funding raised: $43.0M against $2.0M
- LinkedIn following: 7,466 against 1,895
At a glance
| Measure | BioEye | NeuraLight |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Uses smartphone technology to objectively measure eye movements for brain health assessment. | AI-powered digital health company transforming neurology with oculometrics for diagnostics and clinical development. |
| Category | Drug Impairment, Traumatic Brain Injury, Cognitive Decline, Detection | Neurology, Healthcare, Telehealth, Biomarkers |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G, B2B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BioEye | NeuraLight |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3 | 29 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -17.1% | -11.2% |
| Total funding | $2.0M | $43.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,895 | 7,466 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BioEye | NeuraLight |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BioEye | NeuraLight |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
BioEye vs NeuraLight: common questions
Which is better, BioEye or NeuraLight?
On our 0-100 score NeuraLight rates higher (56/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BioEye and NeuraLight compare on the numbers?
NeuraLight leads on our overall score (56/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (40/100 against 29/100), headcount (29 against 3), headcount growth (-11.2% against -17.1%), funding raised ($43.0M against $2.0M), LinkedIn following (7,466 against 1,895).
Read the full BioEye review and pricing or the NeuraLight review and pricing. You can also browse other BioEye alternatives we track.