Balderton vs Hoxton Ventures
Balderton vs Hoxton Ventures, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Balderton is on 33/100 and Hoxton Ventures on 45/100.
Where each one leads
Balderton
- agent readiness: 62/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 47/100
- funding raised: $3.0B against $63.0M
Hoxton Ventures
- our overall score: 45/100 against 33/100
At a glance
| Measure | Balderton | Hoxton Ventures |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A venture capital firm investing in early-stage European technology companies. | Early-stage venture capital firm investing in European technology companies. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Fintech, B2B SaaS, Digital Health | Venture Capital, Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 1999 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Balderton | Hoxton Ventures |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 14 |
| Total funding | $3.0B | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Early Stage Fund IX | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 15,055 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Balderton | Hoxton Ventures |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 33/100 | 45/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 12/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (62/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Balderton | Hoxton Ventures |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Analytics 4, Jetpack Stats |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Balderton vs Hoxton Ventures: common questions
Which is better, Balderton or Hoxton Ventures?
On our 0-100 score Hoxton Ventures rates higher (45/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Balderton and Hoxton Ventures compare on the numbers?
Balderton leads on agent readiness (62/100 against 45/100), domain rating (66/100 against 47/100), funding raised ($3.0B against $63.0M). Hoxton Ventures leads on our overall score (45/100 against 33/100).
Read the full Balderton review and pricing or the Hoxton Ventures review and pricing. You can also browse other Balderton alternatives we track.